David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 7-8):95-108 (2006)
It is hard not to sympathise with Professor Honderich's starting point. It is easy to feel pessimistic about philosophy's ability to throw light on the nature of consciousness. What, then, to do? One option is to persist with the various current approaches. It is clear that Honderich thinks this would be akin to putting more effort into trying to work out the temporal priority of the chicken and the egg. The thought of the orthodox is that an account of consciousness is going to be either fundamentally materialist or fundamentally dualist. The first of these is untenable as consciousness has other or more than neural properties. The second is untenable for various reasons, Honderich's favoured one being that it renders consciousness as out of space and of a mysterious nature. A second option would be to follow Colin McGinn's lead, and think that the problem is of such a nature that it is necessarily unsolvable (McGinn, 1989). Alternatively, we should be more radical and think creatively, not necessarily respecting our current conceptual boundaries between the mental and the physical, the inside and the outside. The solution, Honderich says, lies in the thought that `my consciousness now consists in the existence of a world' (Honderich, 2004, p. 130). I shall say a little about what I understand by this claim, by raising what I take to be three obvious questions, looking at Honderich's answers them, and inviting some further clarification. Throughout I will address only the question of perceptual consciousness.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. L. Mackie (1981). The Efficacy of Consciousness: Comments on Honderich's Paper. Inquiry 24 (October):343-352.
E. J. Lowe (2006). Radical Externalism or Berkeley Revisited? Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 7-8):78-94.
Patrick Madigan (2007). Externalism: Putting Mind and World Back Together Again. By Mark Rowlands and Radical Externalism: Honderich's Theory of Consciousness Discussed. Edited by Anthony Freeman. Heythrop Journal 48 (3):508–509.
Stephen Priest (2006). Radical Internalism. In Anthony Freeman (ed.), Radical Externalism: Honderich's Theory of Consciousness Discussed. Exeter: Imprint Academic. 147-164.
Tim Crane (2006). Comment on Ted Honderich's Radical Externalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 7-8):28-43.
Priest Stephen (2006). Radical Internalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 7-8):147-174.
J. Andrew Ross (2008). Hitting on Consciousness: Honderich Versus McGinn. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (1):109-128.
Anthony Freeman (2006). Radical Externalism: Honderich's Theory of Consciousness Discussed. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Paul F. Snowdon (2006). Radical Externalisms. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8):187-198.
Ted Honderich (2006). Radical Externalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8):3-13.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #194,849 of 1,679,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,003 of 1,679,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?