David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:23-39 (2004)
Augustine was undeniably a dogmatic thinker, but he also had an “aporetic side” which makes him more relevant to Christian philosophers today than isgenerally recognized. Augustine’s first experience of reading philosophy came from Cicero’s Hortensius, from which Augustine gained an appreciation for philosophical scepticism which he never lost. Thus, in all of his works and in all periods of his life, Augustine’s characteristic way of doing philosophy is aporetic, rather than either systematic or speculative. Paradoxically, Augustine’s faith in the truth of Holy Scripture and Church Doctrine gave him a freedom to explore theological and philosophical conundra and, if he could not resolve them, admit frankly that he could not do so. Like Socrates, Augustine was wise partly because he admitted to being puzzled about things that others took for granted. Some of the perplexities which occupied him are: (a) the nature of time; (b) whether it is possible to show someone (without using words) what walking is if one is already walking; (c) whether one is responsible for what one does in one’s dreams; (d) whether one can think about sadness or pleasure by having an image of it in one’s mind, but without experiencing any sadness or pleasure in the thought, and (e) (perhaps most famously, in the Confessions) how one can want something that he does not believe to be good
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Finnis (2004). Self-Referential (or Performative) Inconsistency. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:13-22.
R. A. Markus (1972). Augustine; a Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
G. R. Evans (1982). Augustine on Evil. Cambridge University Press.
David Hunt (1999). ``On Augustine's Way&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):3-26.
Sean J. McGrath (2008). Alternative Confessions, Conflicting Faiths: A Review of the Influence of Augustine on Heidegger. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):317-335.
Mary T. Clark (2005). De Trinitate. In Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge Univ Pr 91--102.
Craig J. N. de Paulo (2003). The Augustinian Constitution of Heidegger's Being and Time. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):549-568.
George Heffernan (2008). Augustinian Skepticism in Augustine's Confessions. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 14:73-86.
Rowan A. Greer (1996). Augustine's Transformation of the Free Will Defence. Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):471-486.
Paul Helm (2003). Augustine's Griefs. Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):448-459.
Phillip Cary (2000). Augustine's Invention of the Inner Self: The Legacy of a Christian Platonist. OUP Usa.
Daniel J. Kirchner (2010). Augustine's Use of Epicureanism. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):183-200.
Vance G. Morgan (1994). Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Added to index2011-01-21
Total downloads23 ( #166,389 of 1,907,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #275,486 of 1,907,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?