The Aporetic Augustine

Abstract
Augustine was undeniably a dogmatic thinker, but he also had an “aporetic side” which makes him more relevant to Christian philosophers today than isgenerally recognized. Augustine’s first experience of reading philosophy came from Cicero’s Hortensius, from which Augustine gained an appreciation for philosophical scepticism which he never lost. Thus, in all of his works and in all periods of his life, Augustine’s characteristic way of doing philosophy is aporetic, rather than either systematic or speculative. Paradoxically, Augustine’s faith in the truth of Holy Scripture and Church Doctrine gave him a freedom to explore theological and philosophical conundra and, if he could not resolve them, admit frankly that he could not do so. Like Socrates, Augustine was wise partly because he admitted to being puzzled about things that others took for granted. Some of the perplexities which occupied him are: (a) the nature of time; (b) whether it is possible to show someone (without using words) what walking is if one is already walking; (c) whether one is responsible for what one does in one’s dreams; (d) whether one can think about sadness or pleasure by having an image of it in one’s mind, but without experiencing any sadness or pleasure in the thought, and (e) (perhaps most famously, in the Confessions) how one can want something that he does not believe to be good
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,948
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
John Finnis (2004). Self-Referential (or Performative) Inconsistency. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:13-22.
G. R. Evans (1982). Augustine on Evil. Cambridge University Press.
David Hunt (1999). ``On Augustine's Way&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):3-26.
Mary T. Clark (2005). De Trinitate. In Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge Univ Pr. 91--102.
George Heffernan (2008). Augustinian Skepticism in Augustine's Confessions. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 14:73-86.
Paul Helm (2003). Augustine's Griefs. Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):448-459.
Paul Helm (2003). Augustine's Griefs. Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):448-459.
Daniel J. Kirchner (2010). Augustine's Use of Epicureanism. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):183-200.
Vance G. Morgan (1994). Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-21

Total downloads

9 ( #156,823 of 1,100,791 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,791 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.