Topoi 16 (1) (1997)
|Abstract||In a recent paper Paul Vincent Spade suggests that, although the medieval doctrine of the modes of personal supposition originally had something to do with the rest of the theory of supposition, it became, by the 14th century, an unrelated theory with no question to answer. By contrast, I argue that the theory of the modes of personal supposition was meant to provide a way of making understandable the idea that a general term in a categorical proposition can be used to refer to the individual things that fall under it. Once that idea had been made acceptable, truth conditons for the various forms of categorical proposition could be given without any specific appeal to the ideas of descent and ascent in terms of which the modes had been defined.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Terence Parsons (1994). Anaphoric Pronouns in Very Late Medieval Supposition Theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (5):429 - 445.
Terence Parsons, Supposition as Quantification Versus Supposition as Global Quantificational Effect[I].
Egbert P. Bos (2007). Richard Billingham's Speculum Puerorum, Some Medieval Commentaries and Aristotle. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):360-373.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2008). An Intensional Interpretation of Ockham's Theory of Supposition. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 365-393.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2007). Theory of Supposition Vs. Theory of Fallacies in Ockham. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):343-359.
Terence Parsons (1997). Supposition as Quantification Versus Supposition as Global Quantificational Effect. Topoi 16 (1).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #106,239 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?