David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 32:251-267 (2007)
Despite their differences, the three most prominent accounts of informational privacy on the contemporary scene—the Control Theory, the Limited Access Theory, and the Narrow Ignorance Theory—all hold that an individual’s informational privacy is at least partly a function of a kind of inability of others to know personal facts about her. This common commitment, I argue, renders the accounts vulnerable to compelling counterexamples. I articulate a new account of informational privacy—the Broad Ignorance Theory—that avoids the commitment by rendering an individual’s informational privacy exclusively a function of others’ ignorance ofpersonal facts about her. I then go on to answer four objections to the Broad Ignorance Theory: that it paradoxically renders private what is in the public domain, that it fails to explain the oddity of attributions of informational privacy to individuals unable to control whether others know various personal facts about them, that it conflates informational privacy and secrecy, and that it conflicts with intuitions about informational privacy losses stemming from false or unjustified beliefs. In the final section of the paper I consider the plausibility of expanding the Broad Ignorance Theory into an account of privacy in general
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martijn Blaauw (2013). The Epistemic Account of Privacy. Episteme 10 (2):167-177.
David Matheson (2013). A Duty of Ignorance. Episteme 10 (2):193-205.
Don Fallis (2013). Privacy and Lack of Knowledge. Episteme 10 (2):153-166.
Klemens Kappel (2013). Epistemological Dimensions of Informational Privacy. Episteme 10 (2):179-192.
David Matheson (2010). Knowing Persons. Dialogue 49 (3):435-453.
Similar books and articles
Gloria González Fuster (2010). Inaccuracy as a Privacy-Enhancing Tool. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95.
Elin Palm (2009). Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201 - 215.
Michael Nagenborg (2009). Designing Spheres of Informational Justice. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):175-179.
Diane P. Michelfelder (2001). The Moral Value of Informational Privacy in Cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):129-135.
Steve Matthews (2008). Privacy, Separation, and Control. The Monist 91 (1):130-150.
Timothy H. Engström (1997). Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public Spheres. Ethics and Behavior 7 (3):239 – 252.
Mark Alfino & G. Randolph Mayes (2003). Reconstructing the Right to Privacy. Social Theory & Practice 29 (1):1-18.
Alan Rubel (2011). The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy. Res Publica 17 (3):275-290.
Luciano Floridi (2005). The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185-200.
Luciano Floridi (2006). Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #120,424 of 1,088,905 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,088,905 )
How can I increase my downloads?