Falsification of theories without verification of basic statements – an argument for the possibility of knowledge growth
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Karl Popper rightly contests the possibility of a verification of basic statements. At the same time he strictly believes in the possibility of growth of empirical knowledge. Knowledge growth, however, is only possible if empirical theories can be falsified. This raises the question, how theories can be falsified, if a verification of those statements that falsify theories – i.e. basic statements – is not possible. This problem is often referred to as the “basic problem” or “problem of the empirical basis”. In this paper I show that – from a logical point of view – a falsification of theories is possible without a verification of basic state-ments. Furthermore I show that knowledge growth in the empirical sciences will be possible if two assumptions are valid. These assumptions can neither be proven nor falsified. However, they have to be postulated by everybody in eve-ryday life.
|Keywords||falsification basic statements empirical knowledge knwoledgs growth basic problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tomasz Bigaj (2003). The Indispensability Argument – a New Chance for Empiricism in Mathematics? Foundations of Science 8 (2):173-200.
Gerard Radnitzky (1987). The 'Economic' Approach to the Philosophy of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):159-179.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Falsificationism Falsified. Foundations of Science 11 (3):275-286.
E. Lagerspet (2004). Predictability and the Growth of Knowledge. Synthese 141 (3):445 - 459.
Herbert Keuth (1978). Methodologische Regeln Des Kritischen Rationalismus. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 9 (2):236-255.
Theodore J. Everett (2010). Observation and Induction. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):303-324.
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2003). Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science. Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1973). Empirical Knowledge; Readings From Contemporary Sources. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #169,667 of 1,100,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?