The benevolent health worm : Comparing western human rights-based ethics and confucian duty-based moral philosophy [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):11-25 (2008)
Censorship in the area of public health has become increasingly important in many parts of the world for a number of reasons. Groups with vested interest in public health policy are motivated to censor material. As governments, corporations, and organizations champion competing visions of public health issues, the more incentive there may be to censor. This is true in a number of circumstances: curtailing access to information regarding the health and welfare of soldiers in the Kuwait and Iraq wars, poor health conditions in Aboriginal communities, downplaying epidemics to bolster economies, and so forth. This paper will look at the use of a computer worm (the benevolent health worm) to disseminate vital information in␣situations where public health is threatened by government censorship and where there is great risk for those who ‹speak out’. The discussion of the benevolent health worm is focused on the Peoples’ Republic of China (China) drawing on three public health crises: HIV/AIDS, SARS and Avian Influenza. Ethical issues are examined first in a general fashion and then in a specific manner which uses the duty-based moral philosophy of Confucianism and a Western human rights-based analysis. Technical, political and legal issues will also be examined to the extent that they better inform the ethical debate
|Keywords||Confucius Internet access to information censorship computer worms freedom of expression hacker human rights illegal technology malware moral philosophy public health virus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Chan (2002). Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
Edward Slingerland (2001). Virtue Ethics, The. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):97-125.
D. F.-C. Tsai (2005). The Bioethical Principles and Confucius' Moral Philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):159-163.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ori J. Herstein (2012). Defending the Right To Do Wrong. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Mary I. Bockover (2010). Confucianism and Ethics in the Western Philosophical Tradition II: A Comparative Analysis of Personhood. Philosophy Compass 5 (4):317-325.
Jui-pʻing Fan (ed.) (1999). Confucian Bioethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alan Strudler (2008). Confucian Skepticism About Workplace Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Eugene Rice (2005). Buddhist Compassion as a Foundation for Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:95-108.
Adam D. Bailey (2011). Confucianism-Based Rights Skepticism and Rights in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):661-672.
X. Chen & R. Fan (2010). The Family and Harmonious Medical Decision Making: Cherishing an Appropriate Confucian Moral Balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):573-586.
A. T. Nuyen (2009). Moral Obligation and Moral Motivation in Confucian Role-Based Ethics. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):1-11.
A. T. Nuyen (2007). Confucian Ethics as Role-Based Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):315-328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #148,315 of 1,932,483 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #271,862 of 1,932,483 )
How can I increase my downloads?