Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 62 (3):479-483 (1995)
|Abstract||Abraham Stone recently has published an argument purporting to show that David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics fails to solve the measurement problem. Stone's analysis is not correct, as he has failed to take account of the conditions under which the theorems he cites are proven. An explicit presentation of a Bohmian measurement illustrates the flaw in his reasoning|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Maxwell (1975). Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem? Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
Nicholas Maxwell (1972). A New Look at the Quantum Mechanical Problem of Measurement. American Journal of Physics 40:1431-5..
J. Subramanyam (1997). Measurement and the Justification of the Statistical Postulate in Bohm's Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 113 (3):423-445.
Harvey Brown & David Wallace (2005). Solving the Measurement Problem: De Broglie-Bohm Loses Out to Everett. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 35 (4):517-540.
Harvey R. Brown & David Wallace (2005). Solving the Measurement Problem: De Broglie-Bohm Loses Out to Everett. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 35 (4):517-540.
Peter J. Lewis (2007). Empty Waves in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):787 - 803.
Peter J. Lewis (2007). How Bohm's Theory Solves the Measurement Problem. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):749-760.
Abraham D. Stone (1994). Does the Bohm Theory Solve the Measurement Problem? Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #10,812 of 739,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,166 of 739,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?