David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):105 - 121 (2005)
In this paper I argue that a necessary condition of ones perceiving God is that an experience of the right phenomenological sort be caused in one directly enough by God and – bypassing the issue of what is necessary for an experience to be of the right phenomenological sort – discuss some difficulties in finding reasons for thinking that God has or has not directly enough caused any such experience.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marie-Agnès Gaudrat (1992). What is God Like? Liturgical Press.
E. Glenn Wagner (2005). God: An Honest Conversation for the Undecided. Waterbrook Press.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Brian Davies (2005). Thoughts About God. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:21-27.
William P. Alston (1991). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cornell University Press.
T. J. Mawson (2003). How a Single Personal Revelation Might Not Be a Source of Knowledge. Religious Studies 39 (3):347-357.
Nick Zangwill (2004). The Myth of Religious Experience. Religious Studies 40 (1):1-22.
Elmer L. Towns (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #118,577 of 1,907,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #77,142 of 1,907,551 )
How can I increase my downloads?