Religious Studies 40 (3):361-364 (2004)
|Abstract||This paper provides a comment on Brian Zamulinksi's article in Religious Studies, 39 (2003), 43–60. Contrary to Zamulinski's claim that religions are not truth-oriented but function as fictions, it is contended that they could not serve the purpose he assigns them unless their adherents regarded them as true. Religions must therefore be truth-oriented. The substantive question is whether any of them are true, and Zamulinski's paper provides no new method for addressing this question. (Published Online August 11 2004).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alphonso Lingis (2011). Truth in Reconciliation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):239-243.
David Gnanaprakasam Moses (1950). Religious Truth and the Relation Between Religions. Madras, Christian Literature Society for India.
Gavin D'Costa (1996). The Impossibility of a Pluralist View of Religions. Religious Studies 32 (2):223 - 232.
John Hick (ed.) (1974). Truth and Dialogue in World Religions: Conflicting Truth-Claims. Philadelphia,the Westminster Press.
Michael Scott (2005). Do Religious Beliefs Aim at the Truth? Religious Studies 41 (2):217-224.
Frank H. Knight (1965). Truth in the Religions:Truth in the Religions: A Sociological and Psychological Approach. William Montgomery Watt. Ethics 75 (4):291-.
H. M. Vroom (1989). Religions and the Truth: Philosophical Reflections and Perspectives. Editions Rodopi.
Rik Peels (2010). The Ethics of Belief and Christian Faith as Commitment to Assumptions. Religious Studies 46 (1):97-107.
Brian Zamulinski (2004). Rejoinder to Mawson. Religious Studies 40 (3):365-366.
Brian Zamulinski (2003). Religion and the Pursuit of Truth. Religious Studies 39 (1):43-60.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,239 of 548,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?