David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Philosopher’s Magazine (31, 3rd Quarter 2005):37-41 (2005)
Science has been under attack ever since William Blake and Romantic movement. In our time, criticisms of modern science have led to Alan Sokal's spoof, and the so-called science wars. Both sides missed the point. Science deserves to be criticized for seriously misrepresenting its highly problematic aims, which have metaphysical, value and political assumptions associated with them. Instead of repressing these problematic aims, science ought rather to make them explicit, so that they can be critically assessed and, we may hope, improved.
|Keywords||Science under attack Romantic criticisms Science wars Problematic aims of science Science, metaphysics, values and politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Maxwell (1977). Articulating the Aims of Science. Nature 265 (January 6):2.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Nicholas Maxwell (2004). Is Science Neurotic? Imperial College Press.
Dudley Shapere (1991). Leplin on Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):655-677.
F. A. Muller (2008). In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell's Master Argument and Aberrant Theories. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (1):131 - 156.
Nicholas Maxwell (2008). Do We Need a Scientific Revolution? Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Alfred I. Tauber (2009). Science and the Quest for Meaning. Baylor University Press.
Wenceslao J. González (2008). Economic Values in the Configuration of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):85-112.
Noretta Koertge (2000). Science, Values, and the Value of Science. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):57.
Sharon L. Crasnow (1993). Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (3):194-201.
Leon E. Trachtman (2000). Science Under Siege?: Interest Groups and the Science Wars. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Patrick Suppes (1986). Book Review:Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate Larry Laudan. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 53 (3):449-.
Dimitri Ginev (2005). Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
Elizabeth Potter (1995). Good Science and Good Philosophy of Science. Synthese 104 (3):423 - 439.
Added to index2011-03-18
Total downloads84 ( #16,506 of 1,099,909 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,115 of 1,099,909 )
How can I increase my downloads?