David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46 (August):127-146 (1968)
My aim in this paper is to defend a version of the brain process theory, or identity thesis, which differs in one important respect from the theory put forward by J.J.C. Smart. I shall argue that although the sensations which a person experiences are, as a matter of contingent fact, brain processes, nonetheless there are facts about sensations which cannot be described or understood in terms of any physical theory. These 'mental' facts cannot be described by physics for the simple reason that physical descriptions are designed specifically to avoid mentioning such facts. Thus in giving a physical explanation of a sensation we necessarily describe and render intelligible that sensation only as a physical process, and not also as a sensation. If we are to describe and render intelligible a person's sensations, or inner experiences, as sensations, and not as physical processes occurring in that person's brain, then we must employ a kind of description that connot be derived from any set of physical statements.
|Keywords||Antireductionism Brain Epistemology Identity Theory Metaphysics Physicalism Sensation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nicholas Maxwell (1966). Physics and Common Sense. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (February):295-311.
J. J. C. Smart (1963). Philosophy And Scientific Realism. Humanities Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicholas Maxwell (2010). Reply to Comments on Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom. Philosophia 38 (4):667-690.
Agustin Vicente (2010). An Enlightened Revolt: On the Philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Philosophia 38 (4):38: 631- 648.
Similar books and articles
Stanley Munsat (1969). Could Sensations Be Processes? Mind 78 (April):247-51.
John Heil (1970). Sensations, Experiences, and Brain Processes. Philosophy 45 (July):221-6.
W. D. Joske (1960). Sensations and Brain Processes: A Reply to Professor Smart. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):157-60.
Peter Pagin (2000). Sensation Terms. Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.
John T. Stevenson (1960). Sensations and Brain Processes: A Reply to J.J.C. Smart. Philosophical Review 69 (October):505-10.
Thomas W. Polger & Kenneth J. Sufka (2005). Closing the Gap on Pain: Mechanism, Theory, and Fit. In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.
George Pitcher (1960). Sensations and Brain Processes: A Reply to Professor Smart. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (August):150-7.
Kenneth J. Sufka & Thomas W. Polger (2005). Closing the Gap on Pain. In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Mit Press.
Joseph Margolis (1965). Brain Processes and Sensations. Theoria 31 (2):133-38.
Clive Vernon Borst (1970). The Mind-Brain Identity Theory: A Collection of Papers. New York,St Martin's P..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads99 ( #12,506 of 1,099,913 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #17,184 of 1,099,913 )
How can I increase my downloads?