Why are U.s. Lawyers not learning from comparative law?
| Abstract | Address the problem of comparative law in the United States. Explains why comparative law matters. Gives reasons why U.S. lawyers are not learning from comparative law. These include lack of skills, lack of institutional supports, and legal structures that resist comparative law. and an attitude that comparative law has little to teach. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesColin B. Picker (2010). A Framework for Comparative Analyses of International Law and its Institutions : Using the Example of the World Trade Organization. In Eleanor Cashin-Ritaine, Seán Patrick Donlan & Martin Sychold (eds.), Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions: Lausanne, 10-11 September 2009. Schulthess.
Edwin Godfrey (ed.) (1995). Law Without Frontiers: A Comparative Survey of the Rules of Professional Ethics Applicable to the Cross-Border Practice of Law. International Bar Association.
Lukas Heckendorn Ursheler (2010). Multidimensional Hybridity : Nepali Law From a Comparative Perspective. In Eleanor Cashin-Ritaine, Seán Patrick Donlan & Martin Sychold (eds.), Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions: Lausanne, 10-11 September 2009. Schulthess.
George P. Fletcher (2007). The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,683 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
