What’s Wrong With Science? Towards a People’s Rational Science of Delight and Compassion, Second Edition
Pentire Press (2009)
|Abstract||What ought to be the aims of science? How can science best serve humanity? What would an ideal science be like, a science that is sensitively and humanely responsive to the needs, problems and aspirations of people? How ought the institutional enterprise of science to be related to the rest of society? What ought to be the relationship between science and art, thought and feeling, reason and desire, mind and heart? Should the social sciences model themselves on the natural sciences: or ought they to take a different form if they are to serve the interests of humanity objectively, sensitively and rigorously? Might it be possible to get into human life, into art, education, politics, industry, international affairs, and other domains of human activity, the same kind of progressive success that is found so strikingly, on the intellectual level, within science? These are some of the questions tackled by What’s Wrong With Science? But the book is no abstruse treatise on the philosophy of science. Most of it takes the form of a passionate debate between a Scientist and a Philosopher, a debate that is by turns humorous, ironical, bitter, dramatically explosive. Even as the argument explores the relationship between thought and feeling, reason and desire, the two main protagonists find it necessary to examine their own feelings and motivations. The book is a delight to read and can be understood by anyone. The book should have a wide appeal. It will be of interest to any scientist concerned about the intellectual and moral integrity of modern science – whether working in a physical, biological or social science. It will be of interest to educationalists, science teachers, students, 6th form pupils, historians, sociologists and philosophers of science, and indeed to anyone concerned about the place and role of science and technology in the modern world. First published in 1976, the book is even more relevant today than it was 33 years ago. This second edition has a new introduction in which the author explains how the book both exploits and develops Karl Popper’s philosophy.|
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Philosophy of Science|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Maxwell (1976). What's Wrong with Science?: Towards a People's Rational Science of Delight and Compassion. Bran's Head Books Ltd.
T. A. Goudge (1979). Book Reviews : What's Wrong with Science? Towards a People's Rational Science of Delight and Compassion. By Nicholas Maxwell. Hayes, Middlesex, England: Bran's Head Books Ltd., 1976. Pp. XI + 260. 5.50/$14.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (2):241-244.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
R. G. A. Dolby (1996). Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World. Cambridge University Press.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Mark Erickson (2005). Science, Culture and Society: Understanding Science in the Twenty-First Century. Polity.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Rom Harré (1985). The Philosophies of Science. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Maxwell (2004). Is Science Neurotic? Imperial College Press.
Janet A. Kourany (2003). A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty‐First Century. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
Steven Yearley (2005). Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. Sage Publications.
R. Hanbury Brown (1986). The Wisdom of Science: Its Relevance to Culture and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Philipp Frank (1957/2004). Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science and Philosophy. Dover Publications.
Added to index2011-03-18
Total downloads18 ( #67,622 of 549,533 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,533 )
How can I increase my downloads?