David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):3-21 (2009)
How might we think about equality in a non-hierarchical fashion? How might equality be conceived with some degree of equality? The problem with the presupposition of liberalism is that, by distributing equality, liberals place most people at the receiving end of the political operation. There are those who distribute equality and those who receive it. Once you start with that assumption, the hierarchy is already in place. It’s too late to return to equality. Equality, instead of being the result of a political process, must be conceived as the presupposition of those who act. It must be the expression of political actors rather than the possession of a political hierarchy. In the formulation of Jacques Rancière, whose ideas form the framework of my thinking in this paper, “Politics only happens when these mechanisms are stopped in their tracks by the effect of a presupposition that is totally foreign to them yet without which none of them could ultimately function: the presupposition of the equality of anyone and everyone.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Wall (2007). Democracy and Equality. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Todd May (2010). Contemporary Political Movements and the Thought of Jacques Rancière: Equality in Action. Edinburgh University Press.
David Schweickart, Democratic Socialism Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice Sage Reference Project (Forthcoming).
Wojciech Sadurski (2008). Equality and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Oliver Davis, What Follows From Jacotisme? Exploring Jacques Rancière's Concept of "Declarative" or "Active" Equality.
Fabienne Peter (2007). The Political Egalitarian's Dilemma. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373 - 387.
Martin W. Bunder, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin (1989). On Adding (Ξ) to Weak Equality in Combinatory Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):590-607.
Chenyang Li (2012). Equality and Inequality in Confucianism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):295-313.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2010). Confucian Democracy and Equality. Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
Thom Brooks (2007). Equality and Democracy. Ethical Perspectives 14 (1):3-12.
Jan Masschelein (2010). Hatred of Democracy ... And of the Public Role of Education. Introduction to the Special Issue on Jacques Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):509-522.
Carina Fourie (2012). What is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal. Res Publica 18 (2):107-126.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads21 ( #177,510 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #138,417 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?