David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602 (2011)
Instrumentalism about moral compromise in politics appears inconsistent with accepting both the existence of non-instrumental or principled reasons for moral compromise in close personal friendships and a rich ideal of civic friendship. Using a robust conception of political reconciliation during democratic transitions as an example of civic friendship, I argue that all three claims are compatible. Spouses have principled reasons for compromise because they commit to sharing responsibility for their joint success as partners in life, and not because their relationship involves strong affective attitudes of goodwill, solidarity, trust, and the like. Since shared responsibility for ends is an inappropriate element in the political relationship between citizens, the members of a divided society may manifest the constitutive attitudes of political reconciliation without any commitment to principled reasons for moral compromise.
|Keywords||moral compromise civic friendship political reconciliation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Michael Bratman (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge University Press.
John Rawls (1999). Collected Papers. Harvard University Press.
Margaret Urban Walker (2006). Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations After Wrongdoing. Cambridge.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Weinstock (2013). On the Possibility of Principled Moral Compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):537-556.
Similar books and articles
Kendy M. Hess (2011). Review of Colleen Murphy, A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (4).
R. K. Bentley (2013). Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship. Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Simon Hope (2013). Friendship, Justice, and Aristotle: Some Reasons to Be Sceptical. Res Publica 19 (1):37-52.
Joyce L. Jenkins (1999). The Advantages of Civic Friendship. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Lawrence Quill (2009). After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.
Kerri Woods (2013). Civic and Cosmopolitan Friendship. Res Publica 19 (1):81-94.
Alin Fumurescu (2013). Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History. Cambridge University Press.
Eleni Leontsini (2013). The Motive of Society: Aristotle on Civic Friendship, Justice, and Concord. Res Publica 19 (1):21-35.
P. Jones & I. O'Flynn (2013). Can a Compromise Be Fair? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.
Daniel Brudney (2013). Two Types of Civic Friendship. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):729-743.
Gerald R. Winslow (1991). Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Charles Blattberg (2000). From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First. Oxford University Press.
Michele Moody-Adams (2010). Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. [REVIEW] Philosophia 38 (3):429-437.
Simon Căbulea May (2005). Principled Compromise and the Abortion Controversy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (4):317–348.
Jerry D. Goodstein (2000). Moral Compromise and Personal Integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):805-819.
Added to index2011-11-21
Total downloads67 ( #65,542 of 1,911,379 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #251,182 of 1,911,379 )
How can I increase my downloads?