Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):299 - 319 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1353/csp.2011.0039

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The central error in the tractatus Hartley Slater.Hartley Slater - manuscript
Randomness and the justification of induction.Scott Campbell & James Franklin - 2004 - Synthese 138 (1):79 - 99.
The epistemological root of the problem of induction.Massimiliano Badino - unknown
Review of Deborah G. Mayo, Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. [REVIEW]Adam La Caze - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Induction without probabilities.John D. Norton - 2006
The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3209-3226.
An error in the argument from conditionality and sufficiency to the likelihood principle.Deborah G. Mayo - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 305.
Learning from error, severe testing, and the growth of theoretical knowledge.Deborah G. Mayo - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 28.
Error statistics and learning from error: Making a virtue of necessity.Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):212.
Error and the law : exchanges with Larry Laudan.Deborah G. Mayo - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 397.
Contra Margolis' Peircean Constructivism: A Peircean Pragmatic "Logos".Kelley J. Wells - 1994 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (4):839 - 860.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Kettlewell from an error statisticians's point of view.David Wÿss Rudge - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (1):59-77.
Popper versus Lorenz: An Exploration into the Nature of Evolutionary Epistemology.Kai Hahlweg - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:172-182.
Practical induction.Elijah Millgram - 1997 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
90 (#182,824)

6 months
11 (#191,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Deborah Mayo
Virginia Tech

Citations of this work

Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis.Felipe Romero - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (11):e12633.
Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction.Daniel Frey & Dunja Šešelja - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1411-1437.
Can the Behavioral Sciences Self-correct? A Social Epistemic Study.Felipe Romero - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60 (C):55-69.
Charles Sanders Peirce.Robert W. Burch - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references