Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study [Book Review]

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):265–273 (2010)
Abstract
In defending his interest-relative account of knowledge in Knowledge and Practical Interests (2005), Jason Stanley relies heavily on intuitions about several bank cases. We experimentally test the empirical claims that Stanley seems to make concerning our common-sense intuitions about these bank cases. Additionally, we test the empirical claims that Jonathan Schaffer seems to make in his critique of Stanley. We argue that our data impugn what both Stanley and Schaffer claim our intuitions about such cases are. To account for these results, one must develop a better conception of the connection between a subject's interests and her body of knowledge than those offered by Stanley and Schaffer.
Keywords subject sensitive invariantism  bank cases  contextualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Joshua May, Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA

View all 18 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-02-05

Total downloads

183 ( #3,361 of 1,101,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

19 ( #8,499 of 1,101,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.