Understanding Human Agency
Oxford University Press (2011)
| Abstract | Our self-understanding as human agents includes a commitment to three crucial claims about human agency: that agents must be active, that actions are part of the natural order of the universe, and that intentional actions can be explained by the agent's reasons for acting. While all of these claims are indispensable elements of our view of ourselves as human agents, they are in continuous conflict and tension with one another, especially once one adopts the currently predominant view of what the natural order must be like. One of the central tasks of philosophy of action consists in showing how, despite appearances, these conflicts can be resolved and our self-understanding as agents be vindicated. The mainstream of contemporary philosophy of action holds that this task can only be fulfilled by an event-causal reductive view of human agency, paradigmatically embodied in the so-called 'standard model' developed by Donald Davidson. Erasmus Mayr, in contrast, develops a new agent-causal solution to these conflicts and shows why this solution is superior both to event-causalist accounts and to Von Wright's intentionalism about agency. He offers a comprehensive theory of substance-causation on the basis of a realist conception of powers, which allows one to see how the widespread rejection of agent-causation rests on an unfounded 'Humean' view of nature and of causal processes. At the same time, Mayr addresses the question of the nature of reasons for acting and complements its substance-causal account of activity with a non-causal account of acting for reasons in terms of following a standard of success. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Agent (Philosophy Act (Philosophy | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $76.50 direct from Amazon (10% off) $159.49 used Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | BD450.M341 2011 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0199606218 9780199606214 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarkus E. Schlosser (2008). Agent-Causation and Agential Control. Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):3-21.
Timothy O'Connor (1995). Agent Causation. In Timothy O'Connor (ed.), Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Rebekah Rice (2011). Agent Causation and Acting for Reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):333-346.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2011). First-Personal Aspects of Agency. Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):1-16.
Markus E. Schlosser (2007). The Metaphysics of Agency. Dissertation, St. Andrews
Timothy O'Connor (2001). Dualist and Agent-Causal Theories. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), Oxford Handbook on Free Will. Oup.
Berent Enc (2006). How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions. Clarendon Press.
John Bishop (1990). Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Talbott (2009). God, Freedom, and Human Agency. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):378-397.
Joshua M. Wood (forthcoming). Hume and the Metaphysics of Agency. Journal of the History of Philosophy.
Ezio Di Nucci (2008). Mind Out of Action. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Beth Huffer (2007). Actions and Outcomes: Two Aspects of Agency. Synthese 157 (2):241 - 265.
James Lenman (2008). Actions, Motives and Causes. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):353–362.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-02-23Total downloads27 ( #46,566 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #13,189 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
