The evidential significance of thought experiment in science

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    James Robert Brown (1992). Why Empiricism Won't Work. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:271 - 279.
    David Gooding (1994). Imaginary Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1029-1045.
    David C. Gooding (1992). What is Experimental about Thought Experiments? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:280 - 290.

    View all 15 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    Margaret Schabas (2008). Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):161-169.
    David Atkinson (2004). Galileo and Prior Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):115-136.
    P. Palmieri (2003). Mental Models in Galileo's Early Mathematization of Nature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):229-264.
    Similar books and articles
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-07-27

    Total downloads

    13 ( #100,556 of 1,088,782 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,743 of 1,088,782 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.