What Quantum Mechanics Doesn't Show

Teaching Philosophy 39 (2):163-176 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Students often invoke quantum mechanics in class or papers to make philosophical points. This tendency has been encouraged by pop culture influences like the film What the Bleep do We Know? There is little merit to most of these putative implications. However, it is difficult for philosophy teachers unfamiliar with quantum mechanics to handle these supposed implications in a clear and careful way. This paper is a philosophy of science version of MythBusters. We offer a brief primer on the nature of quantum mechanics, enumerate nine of the most common implications associated with quantum mechanics, and finally clarify each implication with the facts. Our goal is to explain what quantum mechanics doesn’t show.

Similar books and articles

Indeterminacy and entanglement: the challenge of quantum mechanics.J. Bub - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):597-615.
Quantum measurements and supertasks.Alisa Bokulich - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):127 – 136.
Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Reality.Thomas Greenlee - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 97--104.
Quantum Mechanics, Interpretations of.Peter J. Lewis - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghì - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-19

Downloads
3,278 (#1,989)

6 months
527 (#2,645)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin McBrayer
Fort Lewis College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Quantum mechanics.Jenann Ismael - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references