|Abstract||Current investigations in epistemology tend to follow either the continental or the analytic school of thought. These schools of thought have different goals for epistemology and different procedures for achieving these goals. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility and profitability of communication between analytic and continental philosophy in epistemology. Wittgenstein's concept of language games will be used to frame the issue', continental and analytic philosophers play different language games. One can successfully interpret a particular language game from the perspective of another language game using the principle of charity. Specifically, the principle of charity allows analytic and continental epistemological to communicate profitably|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Babette E. Babich (2003). On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy : Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy. In C. G. Prado (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Humanity Books.
Jack Reynolds, James Chase, James Williams & Edwin Mares (2010). Introduction: Post-Analytic and Meta-Continental Philosophy. In James Williams, Jack Reynolds, James Chase & Edwin Mares (eds.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
Simon Critchley (1997). What is Continental Philosophy? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
Jack Reynolds & James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy, Co-Authored with James Chase, Stocksfield, UK: Acumen Publishing 2010. ISBN 978-1-84465-245-7. [REVIEW] Acumen.
James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Franca D'Agostini (2001). From a Continental Point of View: The Role of Logic in the Analytic-Continental Divide. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
Jennifer Saul, Feminist Philosophy of Language. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paul M. Livingston (2002). Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience. Synthese 132 (3):239-272.
Jack Reynolds (2006). Sadism and Masochism: A Symptomatology of Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Parrhesia 1 (1):15.
Jack Reynolds (2009). "Continental Philosophy and Chickening Out". International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):255-72.
Simon Critchley (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Neil Levy (2003). Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences. Metaphilosophy 34 (3):284-304.
Jack Reynolds (2011). The Analytic/Continental Divide: A Contretemps? In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), The Antipodean Philosopher: Volume 1, Public Lectures in Australia and New Zealand. Rowman and Littlefield.
Tadeusz Szubka (2010). Richard Rorty and the Analytic Tradition: Radical Break or Partial Continuity? Diametros 25:146-158.
Chris Tucker (2006). Hermeneutics as A...Foundationalism? Dialogue 45 (04):627-46.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-08
Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?