Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Douglas McConnell & Neil Pickering (2005). Clinical Practice, Science, and the Unconscious. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 12 (1):1-7.
Similar books and articles
This paper explores the psychoanalytic conception of the unconscious and critiques it from a phenomenlogical perspective, especially Sartre and Heidegger, with a view to conceptualizing the unconscious from an ontological rather than psychological mindset.
In recent years, a number of contemporary proponents of psychoanalysis have sought to derive support for their conjectures about the _dynamic_ unconscious from the empirical evidence in favor of the _cognitive_ unconscious. It is our contention, however, that far from supporting the dynamic unconscious, recent work in cognitive science suggests that the time has come to dispense with this concept altogether. In this paper we defend this claim in two ways. First, we argue that any attempt to shore up the dynamic unconscious with the cognitive unconscious is bound to fail, simply because the latter, as it is understood in contemporary cognitive science, is incompatible with the former, as it is traditionally conceived by psychoanalytic theory. Second, we show how psychological phenomena traditionally cited as evidence for the operation of a dynamic unconscious can be accommodated more parsimoniously by other means.
Discussion of Douglas McConnell & Neil Pickering, Clinical Practice, Science, and the Unconscious
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

