Graduate studies at Western
Sophia 46 (1):21-34 (2007)
|Abstract||One cannot prove the truth of theological statement, but perhaps one can justify believing them because of the good consequences of doing so. It is irrational to believe statements of which there are good reasons to think false, but those of which there is some, albeit inconclusive, evidence can be believed for pragmatic reasons. However, in the interest of simplicity, it must not be possible to achieve those good consequences without such faith. John Bishop and others have argued that one need only assume theological statements to be true to enjoy the good consequences of a religious life, but in fact, faith is needed for most of these consequences to be achieved.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Erin M. Cline (2009). The Way, the Right, and the Good. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):107-129.
Thomas Schmidt (1999). Religious Pluralism and Democratic Society: Political Liberalism and the Reasonableness of Religious Beliefs. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):43-56.
Robert Heinaman (2002). Plato's Division of Goods in the Republic. Phronesis 47 (4):309-335.
Hamid Vahid (2010). Rationalizing Beliefs: Evidential Vs. Pragmatic Reasons. Synthese 176 (3):447 - 462.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2005). Can Faith Be a Doxastic Venture? Religious Studies 41 (4):435-445.
Robert Heinaman (2002). Plato's Division of Goods in the "Republic". Phronesis 47 (4):309 - 335.
Andrew Koehl (2005). On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Jordan Curnutt (1998). Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology. Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,963 of 740,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?