Divine Causation

Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):3-25 (2000)
Quentin Smith has argued that it is logically impossible for there to be a divine cause of the universe. His argument is based on a Humean analysis of causation (confined to event causation, specifically excluding any consideration of agency) and a principle drawn from that analysis that he takes to be a logical requirement for every possibly valid theory of causation. He also thinks that all divine volitions are efficacious of logical necessity. We argue that all of these claims are faulty, and that theists can resist Smith’s arguments without merely begging the question in favor of a divine cause
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil20001714
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,017
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Daniel von Wachter (2011). Do the Results of Divine Actions Have Preceding Causes? European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):347-367.
Uwe Meixner (2004). Causation in a New Old Key. Studia Logica 76 (3):343 - 383.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

142 ( #25,344 of 1,793,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #344,170 of 1,793,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.