3d/4d equivalence, the twins paradox and absolute time
Analysis 63 (278):114–123 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDeborah K. Heikes (2004). The Bias Paradox: Why It's Not Just for Feminists Anymore. Synthese 138 (3):315 - 335.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J. B. Van Helmont's de Tempore as an Influence on Isaac Newton's Doctrine of Absolute Time. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):216-228.
Kristie Miller (2004). The Twins’ Paradox and Temporal Passage. Analysis 64 (283):203–206.
Alan Sidelle (2001). An Argument That Internalism Requires Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):163-179.
Peter Kroes (1983). The Clock Paradox, or How to Get Rid of Absolute Time. Philosophy of Science 50 (1):159-163.
Samuel Coskey & Joel David Hamkins (2010). Infinite Time Decidable Equivalence Relation Theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):203-228.
Bradley Dowden, Time. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Storrs McCall & E. J. Lowe (2003). D/4D Equivalence, the Twins Paradox and Absolute Time. Analysis 63 (278):114-123.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,385 of 549,367 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,367 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
