Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 67 (2):177-92 (1992)
|Abstract||...the problem of...how cognition...is possible at all...can never be answered on the basis of a prior knowledge of the transcendent [i.e. the external, spatio-temporal, empirical]...no matter whence the knowledge or the judgments are borrowed, not even if they are taken from the exact sciences.... It will not do to draw conclusions from existences of which one knows but which one cannot "see". "Seeing" does not lend itself to demonstration or deduction. [Husserl 1964a, pp. 2-3]|
|Keywords||Metaphysics Mind Phenomenology Subjectivity Nagel, T|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert van Gulick (1985). Physicalism and the Subjectivity of the Mental. Philosophical Topics 13 (3):51-70.
Amedeo Giorgi (2004). A Way to Overcome the Methodological Vicissitudes Involved in Researching Subjectivity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 35 (1):1-25.
Pär Sundström (2002). Nagel's Case Against Physicalism. SATS 3 (2):91-108.
Christian Lotz (2007). From Affectivity to Subjectivity: Husserl's Phenomenology Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeffrey E. Foss (1993). Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Nagel on Consciousness. Dialogue 32 (4):725-36.
Paul G. Muscari (1987). The Status of Humans in Nagel's Phenomenology. Philosophical Forum 19:23-33.
Norman Malcolm (1988). Subjectivity. Philosophy 63 (April):147-60.
David R. Pugmire (1989). Bat or Batman. Philosophy 64 (April):207-17.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2002). Husserl and Nagel on Subjectivity and the Limits of Physical Objectivity. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):353-377.
Charles Taliaferro (1988). Nagel's Vista or Taking Subjectivity Seriously. Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):393-401.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #17,011 of 739,439 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,167 of 739,439 )
How can I increase my downloads?