David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):77-84 (2005)
Robert Brandom has supported his inferentialist conception of semantic content by appealing to the claim that it is a necessary condition on having a propositional attitude that one appreciate the inferential relations it stands in. When we see what considerations can be given in support of that claim, however, we see that it doesn’t even motivate an inferentialist semantics. The problem is that that claim about what it takes to have a propositional attitude does nothing to show that its inferential relations are a feature of its content rather than of the relation that the subject stands in to that content—that is, the attitude.
|Keywords||Inferentialism Brandom, Robert B|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Whiting (2008). Meaning Holism and de Re Ascription. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):pp. 575-599.
Víctor M. Verdejo (2014). Disbelieving the Normativity of Content. Acta Analytica 29 (4):441-456.
Similar books and articles
Tom Rockmore (2002). Brandom, Hegel and Inferentialism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):429 – 447.
John MacFarlane (2010). Pragmatism and Inferentialism. In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explici. Routledge 81--95.
Catherine Legg (2008). Making It Explicit and Clear: From "Strong" to "Hyper-" Inferentialism in Brandom and Peirce. Metaphilosophy 39 (1):105–123.
Lionel Shapiro (2004). Brandom on the Normativity of Meaning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.
John McDowell (2005). Motivating Inferentialism: Comments on Making It Explicit (Ch. 2). Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):121-140.
Mark McCullagh (2005). Inferentialism and Singular Reference. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):183-220.
Gabor Forrai (2009). Brandom on Two Problems of Conceptual Role Semantics. In Barbara Merker (ed.), Vertehen nach Heidegger und Brandom.
David Beisecker (2006). (Re)Motivating Inferentialism Commentary on Mark McCullagh's "Motivating Inferentialism". Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):151-154.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads98 ( #41,633 of 1,907,655 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #127,204 of 1,907,655 )
How can I increase my downloads?