David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 22 (1-4):23 – 54 (1979)
In Section I, the purely conceptual issue as to whether animals other than human beings, all or some, may possess rights is examined. This is approached via a consideration of the concept of a moral right, and by way of examining the claims of sentience, consciousness, capacities for pleasure and pain, having desires, possessing interests, self-consciousness, rationality in various senses. It is argued that only beings possessed actually or potentially of the capacity to be morally self-determining can be possessors of rights. In Section II, normative questions concerning the rights animals might possess if they were to be capable of possessing rights are discussed. The approach followed is that of considering the kinds of argument advanced in support of human rights, and whether these arguments, and the rights they are claimed to establish, are transferable to animals, and whether there are or might be specifically animal rights. In Section III the question of what is or could be the goal of one who recognizes and seeks to respect all rights, animal and human, is raised. In particular, the issue as to whether a goal of maximizing the satisfaction of rights could remain a coherent one if animal rights are acknowledged, is explored.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. G. Frey (1977). Interests and Animal Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 27 (108):254-259.
A. I. Melden (1977). Rights and Persons. University of California Press.
R. G. Frey (1978). Did Socrates Commit Suicide? Philosophy 53 (203):106 - 108.
Leonard Nelson (1956). System of Ethics. Yale University Press.
Tom Regan (1976). McCloskey on Why Animals Cannot Have Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):251-257.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Puryear (forthcoming). Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals. European Journal of Philosophy.
Julia Tanner (2008). Species as a Relationship. Acta Analytica 23 (4):337-347.
Elisa Aaltola (2005). Animal Ethics and Interest Conflicts. Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):19-48.
Frederick Ferré (1986). Moderation, Morals, and Meat. Inquiry 29 (1-4):391 – 406.
Frederick Ferré (1986). Moderation, Morals, and Meat. Inquiry 29 (1-4):391-406.
Similar books and articles
Marna A. Owen (2009). Animal Rights: Noble Cause or Needless Effort? Twenty-First Century Books.
Angus Taylor (1996). Animal Rights and Human Needs. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Paola Cavalieri (2001). The Animal Question: Why Nonhuman Animals Deserve Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1997). Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation: Do Animals Have Rights? Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.
Thomas Auxter (1979). The Right Not to Be Eaten. Inquiry 22 (1-4):221 – 230.
Peter Carruthers (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Rowlands (1998). Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defence. St. Martin's Press.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Tom Regan (1997). The Rights of Humans and Other Animals. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads142 ( #25,344 of 1,793,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #101,373 of 1,793,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?