David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2000)
How does Plato view his philosophical antecedents? Plato and his Predecessors considers how Plato represents his philosophical predecessors in a late quartet of dialogues: the Theaetetus, the Sophist, the Politicus and the Philebus. Why is it that the sophist Protagoras, or the monist Parmenides, or the advocate of flux, Heraclitus, are so important in these dialogues? And why are they represented as such shadowy figures, barely present at their own refutations? The explanation, the author argues, is a complex one involving both the reflective relation between Plato's dramatic technique and his philosophical purposes, and the very nature of his late philosophical views. For in these encounters with his predecessors we see Plato develop a new account of the principles of reason, against those who would deny them, and forge a fresh view of the best life - the life of the philosopher.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$30.98 used (75% off) $30.99 new (75% off) $44.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B395.M295 2000|
|ISBN(s)||9780521653060 0521033799 0521653061 9780521033794|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Fiona Leigh (2007). Platonic Dialogue, Maieutic Method and Critical Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (3):309–323.
Mary Margaret McCabe (2009). XII-Escaping One's Own Notice Knowing: Meno's Paradox Again. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):233-256.
Will Rasmussen (2009). The Realism of Universals in Plato and Nyāya. Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (3):231-252.
Mary Margaret McCabe (2009). Escaping One's Own Notice Knowing: Meno's Paradox Again. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):233 - 256.
Amber Danielle Carpenter (2006). Hedonistic Persons. The Good Man Argument in Plato's Philebus. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):5 – 26.
Similar books and articles
David Evans (2007). Dialogue and Dialectic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:61-65.
Jyl Gentzler (2003). Review: Plato and His Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (445):156-162.
E. E. Benitez (2002). Plato and His Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):115-116.
C. J. Rowe (2007). Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Charles H. Kahn (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.
A. E. Zimmern (1919). Greek Political Theory: Plato and His Predecessors Greek Political Theory: Plato and His Predecessors. 8vo. One Vol. Pp. Xiii + 403. London: Methuen and Co., September, 1918. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (5-6):114-115.
Christopher Gill & Mary Margaret McCabe (eds.) (1996/2000). Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford University Press.
Gerald A. Press (2012). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):133-135.
J. Palmer (2002). Plato and His Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason. Philosophical Review 111 (2):299-302.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #100,267 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?