Pure three-valued łukasiewiczian implication
Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (3):399-405 (1966)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIvo Thomas (1967). Three-Valued Propositional Fragments with Classical Implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2):145-147.
O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky (2011). Ideal Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Ernest Edmonds (1969). Independence of Rose's Axioms for M-Valued Implication. Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):283-284.
Atwell R. Turquette (1954). Many-Valued Logics and Systems of Strict Implication. Philosophical Review 63 (3):365-379.
Carlos A. OLLER (1999). Paraconsistency and Analyticity. Logic and Logical Philosophy 7 (1):91-99.
Håkan Törnebohm (1956). On Truth, Implication, and Three-Valued Logic. Theoria 22 (3):185-198.
R. K. Meyer (1966). Pure Denumerable Łukasiewiczian Implication. Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):575-580.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Amit Malhotra (2002). How to Avoid Deviance (in Logic). History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):215--36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
