Sociobiology and the justification of political action: A commentary on bo shu
Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):81-84 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSin Yee Chan (2000). Can Shu Be the One Word That Serves as the Guiding Principle of Caring Actions? Philosophy East and West 50 (4):507-524.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Shu-hsien Liu (1978). Commentary: Theism From a Chinese Perspective. Philosophy East and West 28 (4):413-417.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
R. Paul Thompson (1980). Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Tamas Bereczkei (1993). An Intellectual Legacy of the Past: The Reception of Sociobiology in the East-European Countries. Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):399-407.
Ronald de Sousa (1990). The Sociology of Sociobiology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):271 – 283.
Zhang Bo Shu (1989). Science or Ideology? A Response to Gary Mccarron. Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):85-88.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,479 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
