David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4):521 - 538 (2011)
Abstract In this paper I discuss how we should distinguish legitimate from illegitimate questions. I will argue that we should not make such distinctions prior to asking our questions; that questioning is more of an art than a science and that this art is part of the art of conversation in general. Nonetheless, the desire to limit in advance the questions that we can legitimately ask is not infrequent. In the philosophy of science this ambition manifests in response to concerns regarding the corruption of scientific knowledge and inquiry. Similarly in the quantitative social sciences researchers develop measures by isolating in advance just those questions that they believe will best illuminate the construct under investigation. In order to preserve the integrity of their data much is done to avoid and adjust for errant respondent understandings of these questions. I argue, however, that limiting our questions in these ways does not secure knowledge and inquiry from bias, but rather unduly limits what we might come to know. Drawing on Gadamer?s work in Truth and Method I argue that we can distinguish legitimate from illegitimate questions, but that we can only do so by first asking them
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Jardine (2007). Dead Questions and Vicarious Understandings: Questioning Gadamer's Genealogy. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):63-78.
Douglas Lackey (1988). Modes of Individuation in Art. Philosophy Research Archives 14:567-580.
Stephen Davies (2006). The Philosophy of Art. Blackwell Pub..
Antti Koura (1988). An Approach to Why-Questions. Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
Paul Macneill & Bronaċ Ferran (2011). Art and Bioethics: Shifts in Understanding Across Genres. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):71-85.
Stephen Davies (2007/2010). Philosophical Perspectives on Art. New York;Oxford University Press.
Elizabeth Prettejohn (2005). Beauty and Art, 1750-2000. Oxford University Press.
Leah McClimans (2010). A Theoretical Framework for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (3):225-240.
William Jaworski (2009). The Logic of How-Questions. Synthese 166 (1):133 - 155.
María Biezma & Kyle Rawlins (2012). Responding to Alternative and Polar Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):361-406.
Matti Sintonen (2004). Reasoning to Hypotheses: Where Do Questions Come? Foundations of Science 9 (3):249-266.
Gregory Currie (2004). Arts and Minds. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-10-20
Total downloads18 ( #153,723 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?