The Differences That Make a Difference: A Comment on Richard Bernstein
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:368 - 373 (1982)
| Abstract | In contrast to Bernstein's emphasis on the common ground shared by Rorty and Habermas, this paper stresses the basic differences between them, particularly their diverse assessments of rationalism, universalism, foundationalism and developmentalism, as well as their opposed evaluations of systematic thought and critical social theory. Several difficulties with Rorty's views on reason, truth and objectivity, as with his historicism and physicalism are suggested. It is concluded that Bernstein's emphasis on the common elements in their "moral-political vision", in the face of these striking theoretical differences, overestimates the extent to which normative ideals can survive being cut off from larger contexts of ideas. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Richard J. Bernstein (1982). What is the Difference That Makes a Difference? Gadamer, Habermas, and Rorty. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:331 - 359.
Charles B. Guignon (1982). Saving the Differences: Gadamer and Rorty. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:360 - 367.
Richard J. Bernstein (1987). One Step Forward, Two Steps Backward: Richard Rorty on Liberal Democracy and Philosophy. Political Theory 15 (4):538-563.
Mark H. Bernstein (1998). On Moral Considerability: An Essay on Who Morally Matters. Oxford University Press.
Richard Bernstein (2001). Comment on Hispanic/Latino Identity by J. J. E. Garcia. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (2):44-50.
Richard Kenneth Atkins (forthcoming). The Inferences That Never Were: Peirce, Perception, and Bernstein's The Pragmatic Turn. In Judith Green (ed.), Richard J. Bernstein and the Pragmatist Turn in Contemporary Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard Rorty (1987). Thugs and Theorists: A Reply to Bernstein. Political Theory 15 (4):564-580.
Alexander V. Stehn (2010). Review: Richard Bernstein’s Dewey in Spanish. [REVIEW] Pragmatism Today 1 (2):78-82.
Richard J. Bernstein (2008). Richard Rorty's Deep Humanism. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 29 (2):53-69.
Roberto Frega (2011). Richard Bernstein and the Challenge of a Broadened Pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3 (2):218-221.
Richard Bernstein & Paul Weiss (1970). An Interview by Richard Bernstein: Paul Weiss's Recollections of Editing the Peirce Papers. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 6 (3/4):161 - 188.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

