David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):81-102 (1999)
Criticizing liberal conceptions such as the autonomous subject and calling for self-interpreting selves, Michael Sandel's first book, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice seems to oppose liberal theory. Methodologically, however, it follows rather than challenges its liberal predecessors: Sandel arrives at his philosophical anthropology through abstraction and deduction. This type of inquiry is not only comparable with that of liberal theory, but also incompatible with self-interpretation as Sandel defines it. The content of his argument undermines its form. It also suggests an alternative approach, historical rather than philosophical reflection, actually transforming the practice of political theory as it aims to transform our self-understanding. Given Sandel's critique and his positive contribution, normative theory must be grounded in particular empirical circumstances. Sandel's second book, Democracy's Discontent, thus represents not just a completion of the earlier analysis, but a necessary methodological change. The significance of the first book lies less in its criticism of liberalism than in its criticism of philosophy as the foundation of political theory. Key Words: empiricism methodology philosophy of social sciences reflexivity Michael Sandel self-interpretation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Louis Hart, Liberalism and Community: Communitarian Criticisms of John Rawls' Liberal Theory of Justice.
Guy Kahane (2011). Mastery Without Mystery: Why There is No Promethean Sin in Enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):355-368.
Tom Hoffman (1999). Humanism and Antihumanism in Lasch and Sandel. Critical Review 13 (1-2):97-114.
Brian Barry (1984). Book Review:Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Michael J. Sandel. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (3):523-.
Frances M. Kamm (2005). Is There a Problem with Enhancement? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.
Colin Farrelly, Does Rawls Support the Procedural Republic? A Procedural Republic? A Critical Response to Critical Response to Sandel's Democracy's Discontent.
Brian Penrose (2000). Must the Family Be Just? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
Michael J. Sandel (2005). Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics. Harvard University Press.
John Tomasi (1994). Community in the Minimal State1. Critical Review 8 (2):285-296.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #84,767 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,992 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?