Graduate studies at Western
Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):44-59 (2002)
|Abstract||Hegel's rejection of the Kantian thing-in-itself makes the "an sich" an ingredient in experience—that about a thing which is not yet present to us is what it is "an sich." Hegel bars thus any philosophical appeal to anything construed as atemporal, a path which I argue was also taken by Nietzsche, Foucault, Rorty, and Habermas. Unlike them, however, Hegel pursues a project of systematic philosophy, which now consists in showing how temporal things mutually support one another. The recent Continental philosophers I discuss do not share this systematic conception; hence some of their most distinctive insights and problems.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kristin Gjesdal (2009). Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Howard Ponzer (2008). Reconciliation in Hegel's Speculative Idealism. Epoché 13 (1):49-66.
Robert B. Pippin (1989). Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Tom Rockmore (2007). On Reading Hegel. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):55-66.
Jon Stewart (2010/2012). Idealism and Existentialism: Hegel and Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
Franz Gabriel Nauen (1972). Revolution, Idealism and Human Freedom: Schelling, Hölderlin and Hegel and the Crisis of Early German Idealism. The Hague,Nijhoff.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,143 of 740,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 740,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?