David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The European Legacy 15 (4):439-465 (2010)
This article draws on the profound affinities between the thought of Levinas and Nietzsche to argue that aesthetics plays a major role in Levinas's ethical philosophy. As in the case of Nietzsche, who called himself “the first tragic philosopher,” aesthetics gives reference to the tragic, yet affirmative content of Levinas's ethics. For both, what Levinas calls the “alterity,” or otherness, of art and literature is located not in an ontological or conceptual “beyond”—in a “spiritual” dimension “which sets itself up as knowledge of the absolute”—but in the “interstices” of language, in the “between times” (entretemps) of its modes of temporality: which can only be accessed by way of “the tragic” in art. Alterity signifies not a privileged, interpersonal dimension freed from the problematics of modernity, but points to the complicity between the West's concept of rationality and its history of barbarism exemplified by the Holocaust. The artwork for Levinas is at once temporally diachronic and spatially diasporic, a region of im powerment that is precisely lacking in the expressive or imaginative em powerment normally attributed to the artwork, but which demonstrates a utopian, emancipatory potential in revealing the fissures and hidden pathways that run through the hegemonic structures and totalizing frameworks of modernity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Caruana (2007). The Drama of Being: Levinas and the History of Philosophy. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):251-273.
Nick Smith (2007). Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Brian Schroeder (2001). The Listening Eye: Nietzsche and Levinas. Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):188-202.
Peter Atterton (2007). Art, Religion, and Ethics Post Mortem Dei. Levinas Studies 2:105-132.
Silvia Benso (2008). Aesth-Ethics. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):163-183.
Georg W. Bertram (2006). Die Idee der Philosophie von Emmanuel Lévinas. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:241-260.
Eric Sean Nelson, Antje Kapust & Kent Still (eds.) (2005). Addressing Levinas. Northwestern University Press.
Tanja Staehler (2010). Images and Shadows: Levinas and the Ambiguity of the Aesthetic. Estetika 47 (2):123-143.
Nicholas H. Smith (2008). Levinas, Habermas and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):643-664.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads8 ( #172,935 of 1,102,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?