Bringing Cognitive Science Back to Life

Idealistic Studies 29 (3):173-213 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is worth noting that Wittgenstein provides an argument against analyticity that Quine allows. For Wittgenstein holds that even explicit conventions cannot determine "how one is to go on". I do not mean that Wittgenstein objects to analyticity. But this means he accounts for it in precisely the sorts of ways that Quine mentions but fails to pursue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bringing Omar back to life.Harvey Cormier - 2008 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (3):pp. 205-213.
Bringing critique back to the philosophy of science.Petri Ylikoski - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):321-324.
Science studies: Bringing the big issues back in.Jon Guice - 1994 - Social Epistemology 8 (2):109 – 115.
Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: A response to Pooley.Dean Rickles - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2):381-387.
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
47 (#330,788)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references