David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southwestern Philosophy Review 17 (1):35-44 (2000)
In his Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Paul Guyer offers an influential reading of Kant’s famous “Refutation of Idealism.” Guyer’s reading has been widely praised as Kantian exegesis but less favorably received as an anti-skeptical line of argument worthy of contemporary interest. In this paper, I focus on defending the general thrust of Guyer’s reading as a response to Cartesian skepticism. The paper falls into two sections. The first section constructs Guyer’s central argument in three steps and gives it a quasi-formal presentation. That presentation reveals the principal obstacle to the argument’s being convincing to a contemporary audience, namely, its apparent reliance on Kant’s prohibition against psychological laws governing mental states. The second section constructs a lemma in defense of Guyer’s general line of attack. In effect, it suggests that that line does not depend on a metaphysical ban on psychological laws, but only on the modest premise that according to the Cartesian’s concept of knowledge such laws cannot justify claims about the temporal order of the self.
|Keywords||kant idealism guyer refutation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Guyer (1983). Kant's Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism. Philosophical Review 92 (3):329-383.
Dennis Schulting (2010). Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate. In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Brian O'Connor (2006). A Missing Step In Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Idealistic Studies 36 (2):83-95.
Corey W. Dyck (2011). Turning the Game Against the Idealist: Mendelssohn's Refutation of Idealism and Kant's Replies. In R. W. Munk (ed.), Mendelssohn's Aesthetics and Metaphysics.
Ted Kinnaman (2002). Epistemology and Ontology In Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 32 (3):203-220.
Paul Guyer (2003). Beauty, Systematicity, and the Highest Good: Eckart Förster's Kant's Final Synthesis. Inquiry 46 (2):195 – 214.
Ralf M. Bader (2012). The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
R. Sebastian (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):489 – 496.
Georges Dicker (2011). Kant's Refutation of Idealism: A Reply to Chignell. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):175-183.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2003). Epistemic Reflection and Cognitive Reference in Kant's Transcendental Response to Skepticism. Kant-Studien 94 (2):135-171.
Paul Guyer (2006). Kant. Routledge.
Paul Guyer (2008). Kant's Transcendental Idealism and the Limits of Knowledge : Kant's Alternative to Locke's Physiology. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press.
Mark Sacks (2006). Kant's First Analogy and the Refutation of Idealism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):113–130.
Added to index2010-09-22
Total downloads36 ( #50,960 of 1,100,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,727 of 1,100,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?