Extended simples
Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141 (2007)
| Abstract | I argue that extended simples are possible. The argument given here parallels an argument given elsewhere for the claim that the shape properties of material objects are extrinsic, not intrinsic as is commonly supposed. In the final section of the paper, I show that if the shape properties of material objects are extrinsic, the most popular argument against extended simples fails. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Simons (2004). Extended Simples. The Monist 87 (3):371--85.
Theodore Sider (2000). Simply Possible. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):585-590.
Sean Drysdale Walsh (2011). Maximality, Duplication, and Intrinsic Value. Ratio 24 (3):311-325.
Roy W. Perrett (2004). The Momentariness of Simples. Philosophy 79 (3):435-445.
Jens Johansson (2009). Constituted Simples? Philosophia 37 (1):87-89.
Josh Parsons (2008). Hudson on Location. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):427-435.
Kris McDaniel (2009). Extended Simples and Qualitative Heterogeneity. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):325-331.
Joshua Spencer (2010). A Tale of Two Simples. Philosophical Studies 148 (2).
Mark Scala (2002). Homogeneous Simples. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):393-397.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads101 ( #6,003 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,093 of 548,983 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
