Hare's argument for utilitarianism
Philosophical Quarterly 33 (133):386-391 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJan Narveson (1978). Liberalism, Utilitarianism, and Fanaticism: R. M. Hare Defended. Ethics 88 (3):250-259.
Ingmar Persson (1983). Hare on Universal Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism. Analysis 43 (1):43 - 49.
John J. McDermott (2010). Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
James W. McGray (1986). From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophy Research Archives 12:79-86.
Harold J. White (1969). An Analysis of Hare's Application of the Thesis of Universalizability in His Moral Arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):174-183.
Wlodek Rabinowicz & Bertil Strömberg (1996). What If I Were in His Shoes? On Hare's Argument for Preference Utilitarianism. Theoria 62 (1-2):95-123.
Tom Carson (1993). Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality. Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
Thomas L. Carson (1986). Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #100,810 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
