David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 4 (1):59-73 (1994)
KRISP is a representation system and set of interpretation protocols that is used in the Sparser natural language understanding system to embody the meaning of texts and their pragmatic contexts. It is based on a denotational notion of semantic interpretation, where the phrases of a text are directly projected onto a largely pre-existing set of individuals and categories in a model, rather than first going through a level of symbolic representation such as a logical form. It defines a small set of semantic object types, grounded in the lambda calculus, and it supports the principle of uniqueness and supplies first class objects to represent partially-saturated relationships.KRISP is being used to develop a core set of concepts for such things as names, amounts, time, and modality, which are part of a few larger models for domains including Who''s News and joint ventures. It is targeted at the task of information extraction, emphasizing the need to relate entities mentioned in new texts to a large set of pre-defined entities and those read about in earlier articles or in the same article.
|Keywords||Parsing knowledge representation semantic interpretation lambda calculus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ray S. Jackendoff (1983). Semantics And Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ronald J. Brachman & James G. Schmolze (1985). An Overview of the KL‐ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science 9 (2):171-216.
Anthony S. Maida & Stuart C. Shapiro (1982). Intensional Concepts in Propositional Semantic Networks. Cognitive Science 6 (4):291-330.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Franklin (1984). Natural Sciences as Textual Interpretation: The Hermeneutics of the Natural Sign. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (4):509-520.
Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska (2007). Meaning and Interpretation. I. Studia Logica 85 (1):105 - 132.
Daniel C. Dennett (1990). The Interpretation of Texts, People and Other Artifacts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:177-194.
Stephen Donaho (1998). Are Declarative Sentences Representational? Mind 107 (425):33-58.
Eero Hyvönen (1986). Applying a Logical Interpretation of Semantic Nets and Graph Grammars to Natural Language Parsing and Understanding. Synthese 66 (1):177 - 190.
E. Francesconi & A. Passerini (2007). Automatic Classification of Provisions in Legislative Texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (1):1-17.
John M. Collins (2011). Why the Debate Between Originalists and Evolutionists Rests on a Semantic Mistake. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):645-684.
Orlin Vakarelov (2010). Pre-Cognitive Semantic Information. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (2):193-226.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #297,179 of 1,941,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,622 of 1,941,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?