David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Leibniz Review 17:31-60 (2007)
In this paper I argue that the hoary theological doctrine of divine concurrence poses no deep threat to Leibniz’s views on theodicy and creaturely activity even as those views have been traditionally understood. The first three sections examine respectively Leibniz’s views on creation, conservation and concurrence, with an eye towards showing their sys- tematic compatibility with Leibniz’s theodicy and metaphysics. The fourth section takes up remaining worries arising from the bridging principle that conservation is a continued or continuous creation, and argues that they can be allayed once two readings of the prin- ciple are distinguished. What emerges from the discussion as a whole is, I hope, a clearer picture of Leibniz’s views on the nature of monadic causation, his understanding of the relationship between divine and creaturely activity, and his position with respect to later medieval and early modern debates over secondary causation
|Keywords||Leibniz concurrence conservation creation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2008). Leibniz's Two Realms Revisited. Noûs 42 (4):673-696.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2007). Leibniz: Creation and Conservation and Concurrence. The Leibniz Review 17:31-60.
Julia von Bodelschwingh (2011). Leibniz on Concurrence, Spontaneity, and Authorship. Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4):267-297.
Donovan Cox (2002). Leibniz on Divine Causation: Creation, Miracles, and the Continual Fulgurations. Studia Leibnitiana 34 (2):185 - 207.
Francisco Suárez (2002). On Creation, Conservation, and Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20, 21, and 22. St. Augustine's Press.
William Lane Craig (1998). Creation and Conservation Once More. Religious Studies 34 (2):177-188.
John Whipple (2011). Continual Creation and Finite Substance in Leibniz's Metaphysics. Journal of Philosophical Research 36:1-30.
Sukjae Lee (2004). Leibniz on Divine Concurrence. Philosophical Review 113 (2):203-248.
Rory Fox (2006). On Creation, Conservation & Concurrence, Metaphysical Disputations 20–22 by Francisco Suarez (Translated and Introduction by A. J. Freddoso). [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 47 (4):645–646.
Helen Hattab (2007). Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes's Physics with His Metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):49-78.
Michael K. Shim (2006). Leibniz on Concept and Substance. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):309-325.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2010). Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Anja Jauernig (2008). Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypotheses. The Leibniz Review 18:1-40.
William F. Vallicella (2002). The Creation–Conservation Dilemma and Presentist Four-Dimensionalism. Religious Studies 38 (2):187-200.
John Whipple (2010). Leibniz on Divine Concurrence. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):865-879.
Ezio Vailati (2002). Leibniz on Divine Concurrence with Secondary Causes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):209 – 230.
Added to index2010-09-22
Total downloads45 ( #58,714 of 1,699,523 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,523 )
How can I increase my downloads?