Environmental Ethics 5 (4):291-317 (1983)
|Abstract||With the emergence of quantum theory, the Newtonian idea that matter is inert, devoid of creativity and sentience, becomes questionable. Yet, physicists have by no means agreed upon an alternative understanding that can replace the Newtonian paradigm. Henry Stapp and others argue that Whitehead’s thought provides a peculiarly appropriate framework for a new understanding of matter in light ofquantum theory. The implications for a theology ofecology are manifold. No longer are matter and mind utterly discontinuous, nor is matter devoid of value until assigned value by humans or by God. Even the divine reality is, in a certain sense, “material.” This calls for a new sensitivity within Western religion, in which religion itself becomes openness to, and appreciation for, physical matter|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kurt Smith (2010). Matter Matters: Metaphysics and Methodology in the Early Modern Period. Oxford University Press.
H. Groot (1936). Het Wezen Van de Materie. Synthese 1 (1):247 - 251.
Christian de Quincey (2008). Reality Bubbles:Can We Know Anything About the Physical World? Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (8):94-101.
Hans Primas (2003). Between Mind and Matter. Mind and Matter 1 (1):81-119.
Stephen Gaukroger (2000). The Role of Matter Theory in Baconian and Cartesian Cosmologies. Perspectives on Science 8 (3):201-222.
Robert E. Doud (1993). Matter and God in Rahner and Whitehead. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):63-81.
Georg Franck (2008). Presence and Reality: An Option to Specify Panpsychism ? Mind and Matter 6 (1):123-140.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?