David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):209-229 (2002)
An examination of Schopenhauer’s epistemology can considerably enhance our appreciation of his philosophical achievement in at least three major ways: First, by shedding light on the unity and internal coherence of his system (especially on the relation between its epistemological and metaphysical components); second, by clearly revealing some of his fundamental disagreements with Kant; and, finally, by making it plain that he is less removed from the mainstream epistemology-centred tradition of modern philosophy than some (including many of his detractors) have supposed. To make good on these claims, I address three questions about his epistemology:(l) Does Schopenhauer accept a foundationalist theory of epistemic justification? (2) On what grounds does he reject skepticism concerning our knowledge of the external world? and (3) In what does he think the true philosophical significance of skepticism consists?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Douglas James McDermid (2003). The World as Representation: Schopenhauer's Arguments for Transcendental Idealism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):57 – 87.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Janaway (1989). Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Robert Wicks (2008). Schopenhauer. Blackwell Pub..
Marco Segala (2010). Schopenhauer and the Empirical Confirmations of Philosophy. Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):27-41.
Christopher Janaway (ed.) (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Cambridge University Press.
Arati Barua (2005). Schopenhauer and Krausz on Objects of Interpretation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):33-37.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1988). Manuscript Remains in Four Volumes. Distributed Exclusively in the Us and Canda by St. Martin's Press.
Julian Young (2005). Schopenhauer. Routledge.
Richard White (2010). Schopenhauer and Indian Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):57-76.
Christopher Janaway (2002). Schopenhauer: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Alex Neill & Christopher Janaway (eds.) (2009). Better Consciousness: Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Value. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sandra Shapshay (2011). Did Schopenhauer Neglect the 'Neglected Alternative' Objection? Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):321-348.
Edward Eugene Kleist (2010). Schopenhauer on the Individuation and Teleology of Intelligible Character. Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):15-26.
Matthew Alun Ray, On the Principles and Presuppositions of Atheism and Agnosticism in Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.
Patrick Stokes (2007). Kierkegaard's Uncanny Encounter with Schopenhauer, 1854. In Roman Kralik & Peter Sajda (eds.), Kierkegaard and Great Philosophers (Acta Kierkegaardiana Vol.2). Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Kierkegaardianos
Arati Barua (2008). Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Will and Sankara's Advaita Vedanta. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:23-29.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads17 ( #204,370 of 1,790,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #322,106 of 1,790,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?