David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 45 (1):3 – 33 (2002)
The most important sources of contemporary American literary theory are neither the linguistics-based movement of French structuralism, as the term 'poststructuralism' implies, nor a 'modernity' that has been superseded, as the term 'postmodernism' implies, but rather a modernist tradition of aesthetics shaped by eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century German romanticism and idealism, movements that culminated in the work of Heidegger during the Weimar period between the World Wars and afterward, exercising an increasingly dominant influence on French theorists after World War II, from Sartre through Derrida, and subsequently on the development of poststructuralism and postmodernism during the 1970s and 1980s in the United States. This essay strives to put well-accepted facts and issues within what Wittgenstein called a 'perspicuous' perspective. Although it is common to observe that deconstruction shares with Romanticism certain very general features, the same judgment is not often applied to deconstruction's semiotic account of language as a system of arbitrary signs without positive values. The essay's claim, by contrast, is that romanticist, especially German influences, operating in complementary relation with influences from the English and French Enlightenments, provided the cultural and conceptual milieu in which literary theory's distinctively modern, characteristically ontological, and anti-metaphysical view of language developed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael J. Loux (ed.) (1979). The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Cornell University Press.
Richard Rorty (1967). The Linguistic Turn. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Martin Heidegger (1975). Gesamtausgabe. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Michael Allen Gillespie (1995). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
Harold G. Coward, Toby Avard Foshay & Jacques Derrida (1992). Derrida and Negative Theology. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Henry McDonald (2004). Language and Being: Crossroads of Modern Literary Theory and Classical Ontology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):187-220.
Tilottama Rajan (2002). Deconstruction and the Remainders of Phenomenology: Sartre, Derrida, Foucault, Baudrillard. Stanford University Press.
Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.) (1987). Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson Humphries (1987). The Puritan and the Cynic: Moralists and Theorists in French and American Letters. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Bowie (1996). From Romanticism to Critical Theory: The Philosophy of German Literary Theory. Routledge.
Mark Currie (2004). Difference. Routledge.
Christopher Norris (1990). What's Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Donald Palmer (1997). Structuralism and Poststructuralism for Beginners. For Beginners Llc.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #281,693 of 1,911,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,986 of 1,911,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?