David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):129-130 (2001)
Measures of retrieval speed for recently presented events show a sharp dichotomy between representations in focal attention and representations that are recently processed but no longer attended. When information is presented over time, retrieval measures show that focal attention and rapid privileged access is limited to the most recently processed unit or chunk, not the last 3–5 chunks that Cowan estimates from various recall procedures
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Clinton L. Johns, Kazunaga Matsuki & Julie A. Van Dyke (2015). Poor Readers' Retrieval Mechanism: Efficient Access is Not Dependent on Reading Skill. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Similar books and articles
Sandra Scarr & Claire B. Ernhart (1993). Of Whistleblowers, Investigators, and Judges. Ethics and Behavior 3 (2):199 – 206.
P. Sven Arvidson (1998). Bringing Context Into Focus: Parallels in the Psychology of Attention and the Philosophy of Science. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 29 (1):50-91.
Tang Yijie & Yan Xin (2008). The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
David Eilam (2006). Ritualized Behavior in Animals and Humans: Time, Space, and Attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):616-617.
Jason Ford (2009). Saving Time: How Attention Explains the Utility of Supposedly Superfluous Representations. Cognitive Critique 1 (1):101-114.
John Kulvicki (2010). Knowing with Images: Medium and Message. Philosophy of Science 77 (2):295-313.
R. W. Kentridge, L. H. de-Wit & C. A. Heywood (2008). What is Attended in Spatial Attention? Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):105-111.
Greg Davis (2001). There is No Four-Object Limit on Attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):119-120.
Robert Rynasiewicz (1986). The Universality of Laws in Space and Time. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:66-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #439,364 of 1,911,316 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,073 of 1,911,316 )
How can I increase my downloads?