Alternative confessions, conflicting faiths: A review of the influence of Augustine on Heidegger [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):317-335 (2008)
The extent of the influence of Augustine on Heidegger, long only indicated in a few notes in Being and Time, has come into focus with the publicationof Heidegger’s earliest lectures. Far from one among many sources upon which Heidegger draws, we now know that Augustine’s Confessions is a central source of concepts for the early Heidegger. While this is further evidence of the ongoing relevance of Augustine to contemporary philosophy, it does not necessarily makeHeidegger an Augustinian thinker. The question of the degree to which Heidegger’s philosophy is compatible with Augustine’s theology is the subject of a recentlypublished volume of papers, The Influence of Augustine on Heidegger. While the editor, Craig de Paulo, proclaims the advent of an “Augustinian phenomenology”founded upon Heidegger, several contributors exhibit more caution, pointing out important divergences between Heidegger—whom no one would call a Christian—and Augustine. The author sides with the skeptics, reading Heidegger as in fact a subversion of Augustine. Heidegger reverses Augustine’s central insight, that the restless heart is intentionally structured, directed toward union with God. Heidegger’s anxiety in the face of death has no intentional term; it is self-reflective,Augustinian agitation without that which agitates it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz, McGrath, Sean. J., the Early Heidegger & Medieval Philosophy. Phenomenology for the Godforsaken, Washington: The Catholic University of America Press 2006, 268 Pages. [REVIEW]
David Wood (2002). Thinking After Heidegger. Blackwell Publishers.
Jeffrey Andrew Barash (2008). Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Memory. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:401-409.
G. R. Evans (1982). Augustine on Evil. Cambridge University Press.
Arne Johan Vetlesen (2001). Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):1-33.
James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Collins-Cavanaugh (2001). The Augustinian Impact on the History of Time. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:183-196.
Timothy Stanley (2007). Heidegger on Luther on Paul. Dialog: A Journal of Theology 46 (1):41-45.
Chad Engelland (2004). Augustinian Elements in Heidegger's Philosophical Anthropology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:263-275.
Craig J. N. de Paulo (2003). The Augustinian Constitution of Heidegger's Being and Time. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):549-568.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #170,633 of 1,796,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #284,809 of 1,796,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?