A puzzle about de rebus beliefs
Analysis 60 (4):297–299 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAgustín Rayo (2010). A Puzzle About Ineffable Propositions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):289 - 295.
Mark Crimmins (2002). Talk About Beliefs. MIT Press.
Michael Whitby (1990). De Rebus Bellicis Hartwin Brandt: Zeitkritik in der Spätantike: Untersuchungen Zu den Reformvorschlägen des Anonymus De Rebus Bellicis. (Vestigia, Beiträge Zur Alten Geschichte, 40.) Pp. Ix + 186. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1988. DM 75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):121-123.
Neil Feit (2001). Rationality and Puzzling Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):29 - 55.
Robert Browning (1953). The De Rebus Bellicis E. A. Thompson: A Roman Reformer and Inventor, Being a New Text of the Treatise De Rebus Bellicis with a Translation and Introduction. Pp. Xii+132; 13 Plates. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952. Cloth, 15s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (02):106-107.
Neil Feit (2001). Rationality and Puzzling Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):29-55.
Christoph Kelp (2008). Classical Invariantism and the Puzzle of Fallibilism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):221-44.
Miriam McCormick (2011). Taking Control of Belief. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):169 - 183.
Agustin Rayo (2000). A Puzzle About de Rebus Beliefs. Analysis 60 (4):297-299.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,523 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
