David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Research Archives 14:23-50 (1988)
Does the “free market” foster more freedom for individuals generally and less coercion? Libertarians and other market advocates argue that the unfettered market maximizes freedom and hence has less coercion than any feasible alternative. Welfare liberals, Socialist, and Marxists, in different ways, argue against the claim that the unrestricted market maximizes freedom generally. Both supporters and critics agree that coercion undermines freedom and that that is what is ultimately prima facie wrong with it. Further, they agree that the extent to which an economic system includes coercion provides a serious strike against it. The problem is that there is little consensus on the necessary conditions for coercion. In this paper I will be concerned with the nature of coercive relationships in the market. Market interactions have a particular character and occur within a specific institutional framework. Other accounts of coercion have failed to capture the unique character of coercion in the market because they have failed to take into account certain nontrivial facts about the market which are essential to the analysis of coercive market relations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sundari Anitha & Aisha Gill (2009). Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies 17 (2):165-184.
Joan McGregor (2006). Does the Use of Human Subjects in Research in Developing Nations Violate Their Human Rights? If so, Are Reparations an Appropriate Response? Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):441–463.
Similar books and articles
S. Olsaretti (2013). Coercion and Libertarianism: A Reply to Gordon Barnes. Analysis 73 (2):295-299.
Friedrich Heubel (2000). Patients or Customers: Ethical Limits of Market Economy in Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):240 – 253.
Fabienne Peter (2004). Choice, Consent, and the Legitimacy of Market Transactions. Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):1-18.
Jan-Willem van der Rijt (2011). Coercive Interference and Moral Judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):549-567.
Danny Frederick (2010). A Competitive Market in Human Organs. Libertarian Papers 2 (27):1-21.
Dennis Attick & Deron Boyles (2010). Montessori, Dewey, and Capitalism: Educational Theory for a Free Market in Education. Education and Culture 26 (1):100-103.
Michael P. Jaycox (2012). Coercion, Autonomy, and the Preferential Option for the Poor in the Ethics of Organ Transplantation. Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):135-147.
Martin Gunderson (1979). Threats and Coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Robert C. Hughes (2013). Law and Coercion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):231-240.
John McMurtry (1997). The Contradictions of Free Market Doctrine: Is There a Solution? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):645-662.
Bernard Hodgson (2012). Democratic Agency and the Market Machine. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):3-14.
Ian Maitland (1998). Community Lost? Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (4):655-670.
Edmund F. Byrne (1995). Public Goods and the Paying Public. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (2):117 - 123.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads32 ( #100,267 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #99,332 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?