Causation by omission: A dilemma [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 123 (1-2):125--48 (2005)
Abstract
Some omissions seem to be causes. For example, suppose Barry promises to water Alice’s plant, doesn’t water it, and that the plant then dries up and dies. Barry’s not watering the plant – his omitting to water the plant – caused its death. But there is reason to believe that if omissions are ever causes, then there is far more causation by omission than we ordinarily think. In other words, there is reason to think the following thesis true.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,768
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Donald Davidson (1967). Causal Relations. Journal of Philosophy 64 (21):691-703.
David Lewis (2000). Causation as Influence. Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.

View all 9 references

Citations of this work BETA
Randolph Clarke (2012). Absence of Action. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):361-376.
Sara Bernstein (2013). Omissions as Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.

View all 13 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

140 ( #5,665 of 1,098,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #14,705 of 1,098,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.